Impact of Globalization in Living Standard

Question: Discuss about theImpact of Globalization in Living Standard. Answer: Introduction Contemporary industries and businessperson follow globalization so that their product and services gets knowledgeable worldwide. The primary reason for the popularity of the globalization is the economic synergy and enhanced trade between various nations. However, in spite of these benefits, globalization diminishes the living standards of the community and this argumentative essay will highlight some points that will support this concept. Educators argue that globalization affects negatively in terms of job inequality and competition due to fewer job opportunities. Moreover, the low quality of education as education costs too much and they cannot complete their study and have to work in low-skilled work that affects their condition. Lastly, environmental sustainability is reduced as due to globalization industrialization and deforestation increase side by side. The essay wraps up with a conclusion of the overall discussion that globalization does not raise the living standard. Discussion The first arguments highlight the concept that due to raising in globalization that rate for urbanization has increased. As a result, more people shifts from rural to urban areas. Purvis (2015) highlighted that this increases the gap between the rural and urban people, which on the other hand affects the living standards of the people. Urbanization increases more job opportunities that lead to inequality, as people from rural areas are familiar with farming and do not know much about technology. For instance, in Latin America, farmers have been driven off their land into cities. Purvis (2015) further portrays that the community they left behind in chance of better opportunity faced more poverty than before. Another concept that highlights the adversity of urbanization is the income gap and inequality. This can be illustrated by the situation of farmers who went to urban areas have to work as second-class migrant workers and cannot fulfill every requirement like daily food and effecti ve education for their children. One example that can reduce the chances for this adversity is to transform a nation from rural to urban like China does in their past. Branigan (2011) furthermore mentioned that the high-income gap among the working personnel in same place or urban nation leads to discrimination and gap in education. The reason behind is that the rural farmers do not know much about the aggregate data for working effectively in the urban industries. Thus, the rapid change in technologies in the industrial process led behind the rural worker who takes much time to attain knowledge. Thus, is clear that effect of globalization on poverty is hard to tease out. The second argument is focused on the concept of that with the increase in the globalization the quality of the education reduces. Epstein and Yuthas (2012) mention that as the income of many people is reduced, they cannot afford the expense of the education in the school. It is also evident that academic institution adopts a standardized education system equipped with all the facilities that increase their cost that normal people cannot afford and as a result, people even cannot afford minimum requirement like lunch, uniform and examination expense. Since there is no basic education in the people, they have to work for low wages, which reduces their living quality in the community. Pavcnik (2009) further explains that these wages are so low that these families usually spend a huge amount of income in food and shelter requirements and not on their childrens education and medications. One of the examples where globalization helps to diminish the poverty is the Vietnam, where the deman d for Vietnamese rice increase after the government liberalize their products. This, however, helps to raise the living condition of those rice farmers but the other side of the coin is that, in order to attain the worldwide attention, businessperson intends to sell a huge stock of their nation's products that is manufactured by low-skilled and poor workers. As a result, the opportunity for child employment in such industries, which discourages the children from going to school otherwise their family, could not survive the poverty. Epstein and Yuthas (2012) moreover, mentions that government agencies and organizations or the world health organization must take initiatives for the quality education and medical care for all the poor children so that they can develop knowledge and skills to lift their condition up from the poverty. Thus, the low income of low-skilled people cannot afford the education along with the requirement for food and shelter. This not only increases the chance o f child labor but it also makes the children work with their poor parents and hence they cannot finish their school for a better-living standard. The third argument highlights that in order to adopt the benefits of the economic growth of the globalization, business people setting up new industries and destroys the natural resources for the free spaces for industrialization. Of such effect is the air pollution that occurred in China due to the high rate of industrialization. The most harmful toxic carbon smog that is PM2.5 spreads 40 times of the maximum allowed level. Experts forecasted that this affects the health of the living people in Beijing, China as a result; 1.2million premature death can occur by 2020 and the quality of the air becomes worse up to 70% by 2025 (Huang 2013). Moreover, China consumes the highest amount of coal and already contributes 85% of the PM2.5 polluted air in the air of China (Huang 2013). Image 1: Fossil Fuel consumed by US and China (Source: Kan 2014) Another consequence of rapid globalization is water pollution due to chemical waste in water bodies, which highlights the environment and social challenges. In this context, also, China is suffering the most and due to industrial chemical disposal in water, 70% of the lakes are polluted among which 40% are severely dangerous to consume in any purpose (Huang 2013). This pollution has been increased so worst that almost 100,000 people lost their lives due to pollution-related illness. Kan (2014) highlights that not only the human life is affecting but the animal consuming water from these lakes also died and as per as 2011 study some 20,000 pigs found dead in Huangpu river. This alarming danger in the air and water of China due to the high rate of globalization give birth to 400 cancer villages that is unfit for living. It is also found from research that the danger of cancer increases 80% compared to 30 years ago (Huang 2013). Thus, even for a developing country, it is hard to partici pate as a leader in the international system if appropriate measures will not be taken to overcome the effect of air and water pollution. Thus, it can be concluded that the high rates of industrialization are a result of globalization, which produce air pollution from chimneys, and water pollution from the chemical waste due to which the quality of life drops along with the living standards. Conclusion Thus, it can be concluded that globalization lowers down the standard of living. The result can be well described from the effect of income inequality that a rural worker has to face in urban states. Moreover, they have to work in low-wages due to which it is difficult for them to afford quality education for their children. As a result, these children can never get a standard education to make their standard of living higher as they support their poor family member in earning money by working in those organizations. Moreover, industrialization left behind the waste materials that affect the air and water bodies in the community, which lowers the heath and enhance the living risks for their survival. Reference List Branigan, T., 2011. China's rural poor left stranded as urbanites race ahead.The Guardian. Epstein, M.J. and Yuthas, K.J., 2012. Redefining education in the developing world. Huang, Y., 2013. China: The dark side of Growth.YaleGlobal. [online] Available at: https://yaleglobal_yale_edu [Accessed 21 Oct. 2016]. Kan, H., 2014. Globalisation and environmental health in China. The Lancet, 384(9945), pp.721-723. Pavcnik, N., 2009. How has globalization benefited the poor?. [Blog]Yale Insights. Purvis, K.,2015. 2015 challenges: urbanisation.The Guardian.